Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33928427›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2021

Systematic review on use and efficacy of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for the management of spasticity in non-pediatric patients.

Pramath Kakodkar, Aria Fallah, Albert Tu

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Role of Dorsal Rhizotomy in the Comprehensive Management of Childhood Spasticity.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pramath KakodkarSchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-1247
Aria FallahDivison of Pediatric Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9703-0964
Albert TuDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Rm 3359 CHEO, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada. atu@cheo.on.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-9202
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSelective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) has been used to improve mobility and reduce lower extremity spasticity in patients with a various CNS conditions. Incidentally, literature on SDR has been performed in the pediatric population as such there is a paucity of research on the use in adult patients.

methodsStudies describing SDR in adults were identified from Medline and Embase databases. Combinations of search terms "Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy," "Selective Posterior Rhizotomy," and "Adult" were used. Only literature in English language on patients over the age of 18 years and that included measures for lower extremity outcome (i.e., spasticity, mobility) were included. Case reports, reviews without primary data, or inaccessible publications were excluded.

resultsOne hundred twenty-nine publications between 1970 and 2019 were identified. Twelve of these publications fit the inclusion criteria (n = 141 patients). In series where it was reported, SDR resulted in ambulatory improvement (54%, n = 44 out of 81), reduced spasticity (75.2%, n = 106 out of 141), and minimized muscle and joint pain (74.5%, n = 64 out of 86). SDR also showed improvement in parameters of the activities of daily life. 92.3% (n = 48 out of 52) of patients post-SDR developed new lower limb paresthesia.

conclusionThe success and efficacy appear durable in the short-term, but further follow-up is necessary to validate these findings. The goal of the intervention dictates the ideal adult patient for SDR. Patients seeking ambulatory improvement, any etiology of spasticity besides MS, seem favorable. Positive locomotive predictors include the ability to isolate lower extremity function, lack of contractures, lower limb strength, and post-SDR physiotherapy.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyRhizotomyAdultCausalityChildDatabases, FactualHumansMiddle AgedMuscle SpasticityTreatment OutcomeAdultCerebral palsyOutcomeRhizotomySelective dorsal rhizotomySpasticity

Identifiers

PMID33928427
OpenAlexW3159438962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.