ReviewDer Internist2021
[Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs): universal tools in adoptive cell therapy].
Review in Der Internist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe observation that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) after ex vivo amplification can control tumors in the long term led to the concept of redirecting patients' cytolytic T‑cells by a receptor with defined specificity against the tumor.
objectivesDevelopment of a recombinant receptor-signal molecule (chimeric antigen receptor, CAR) to increase selectivity and enhance anti-tumor immunity.
methodsDescription of a prototype CAR, overview of the modular composition and further development of CAR technology for use in adoptive immune cell therapy.
resultsIntensive research over the last two decades has shown how CAR-mediated T‑cell activation is influenced by factors such as binding affinity, the epitope of the target antigen, its expression density and accessibility on the tumor cells, as well as by the signaling domains and their combination to induce T‑cell activation. The quality and duration of the T‑cell response can be specifically modulated by modifying the modular composition of the CAR; CAR T‑cells can act as "biopharmaceutical factories" (T-cells redirected for unrestricted cytokine-mediated killing, TRUCK) in the tissue by CAR-mediated release of transgenic therapeutic proteins.
conclusionAdoptive CAR T‑cell therapy has shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of hematological malignancies; the treatment of solid tumors, however, is more challenging. Allogeneic CAR T‑cell technology is aimed at generating "off-the-shelf" CAR T‑cells that are accessible for a large number of patients. A further promising approach is the use of CAR T‑cells for other therapeutic applications such as the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.