ArticleRSC chemical biology2020
Modified nucleoside triphosphates in bacterial research for
Article in RSC chemical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Single-residue engineering of Klenow fragment enables broad acceptance of chemically modified nucleotides.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Sulfur and Selenium Modifications at Phosphorus Atom in Nucleoside Monophosphates, Activity and Potential Applications.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Entabolons: How Metabolites Modify the Biochemical Function of Proteins and Cause the Correlated Behavior of Proteins in Pathways.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Review
- Synthesis and Properties of α-Phosphate-Modified Nucleoside Triphosphates.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Comparison of pre-labelled primers and nucleotides as DNA labelling method for lateral flow detection of Legionella pneumophila amplicons.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ionophore-Based Polymeric Sensors for Potentiometric Assay of the Anticancer Drug Gemcitabine in Pharmaceutical Formulation: A Comparative Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Cationic Polymers Enable Internalization of Negatively Charged Chemical Probes into Bacteria.ACS chemical biology · 2023Article
- Synthetic Biology Pathway to Nucleoside Triphosphates for Expanded Genetic Alphabets.ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- From polymerase engineering to semi-synthetic life: artificial expansion of the central dogma.RSC chemical biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Modified nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs) are invaluable tools to probe bacterial enzymatic mechanisms, develop novel genetic material, and engineer drugs and proteins with new functionalities. Although the impact of nucleobase alterations has predominantly been studied due to their importance for protein recognition, sugar and phosphate modifications have also been investigated. However, NTPs are cell impermeable due to their negatively charged phosphate tail, a major hurdle to achieving live bacterial studies. Herein, we review the recent advances made to investigate and evolve bacteria and their processes with the use of modified NTPs by exploring alterations in one of the three moieties: the nucleobase, the sugar and the phosphate tail. We also present the innovative methods that have been devised to internalize NTPs into bacteria for
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.