Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33928247›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Trust your gut: vagal nerve stimulation in humans improves reinforcement learning.

Immo Weber, Hauke Niehaus, Kristina Krause, Lena Molitor, Martin Peper, Laura Schmidt, Lukas Hakel, Lars Timmermann, Katja Menzler, Susanne Knake and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Oxidative Stress in Brain Function.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Immo WeberDepartment of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2979-234X
Hauke NiehausFaculty of Psychology, Neuropsychology Section, Philipps-University Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3767-8133
Kristina KrauseDepartment of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Lena MolitorDepartment of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Martin PeperFaculty of Psychology, Neuropsychology Section, Philipps-University Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany.
Laura SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Lukas HakelDepartment of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Lars TimmermannDepartment of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Katja MenzlerDepartment of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Susanne KnakeDepartment of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Carina R OehrnDepartment of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas the effect of vagal nerve stimulation on emotional states is well established, its effect on cognitive functions is still unclear. Recent rodent studies show that vagal activation enhances reinforcement learning and neuronal dopamine release. The influence of vagal nerve stimulation on reinforcement learning in humans is still unknown. Here, we studied the effect of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on reinforcement learning in eight long-standing seizure-free epilepsy patients, using a well-established forced-choice reward-based paradigm in a cross-sectional, within-subject study design. We investigated vagal nerve stimulation effects on overall accuracy using non-parametric cluster-based permutation tests. Furthermore, we modelled sub-components of the decision process using drift-diffusion modelling. We found higher accuracies in the vagal nerve stimulation condition compared to sham stimulation. Modelling suggests a stimulation-dependent increase in reward sensitivity and shift of accuracy-speed trade-offs towards maximizing rewards. Moreover, vagal nerve stimulation was associated with increased non-decision times suggesting enhanced sensory or attentional processes. No differences of starting bias were detected for both conditions. Accuracies in the extinction phase were higher in later trials of the vagal nerve stimulation condition, suggesting a perseverative effect compared to sham. Together, our results provide first evidence of causal vagal influence on human reinforcement learning and might have clinical implications for the usage of vagal stimulation in learning deficiency.

Indexed as

cognitiondecision-makingextinctionreinforcement learningvagal nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33928247
PMCPMC8066886
OpenAlexW3139120093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.