Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33928215›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2021

Diet Quality and Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival: The Pathways Study.

Isaac J Ergas, Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano, Patrick T Bradshaw, Janise M Roh, Marilyn L Kwan, Jen Cadenhead, Margarita Santiago-Torres, Alyssa N Troeschel, Barbara Laraia, Kristine Madsen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Isaac J ErgasDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3187-9754
Elizabeth M Cespedes FelicianoDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-4017
Patrick T BradshawDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7761-3129
Janise M RohDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-4320
Marilyn L KwanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8863-3950
Jen CadenheadDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5922-3597
Margarita Santiago-TorresDivision of Public Health Sciences, Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6051-3172
Alyssa N TroeschelDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1564-3642
Barbara LaraiaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0493-2900
Kristine MadsenDivision of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1880-5363
Lawrence H KushiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9136-1175
Kaiser Permanente · USBerkeley Public Health Division · USEmory University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Prospective Study of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipR01CA105274 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2004 to 2014
$19.9M
Infrastructure for Pathways, a Prospective Study of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipU01CA195565 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AMBROSONE, CHRISTINE B., KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2016 to 2025
$18.8M
Body composition and breast cancer survival: immune and metabolic biomarkers in breast tumors - Disparities SupplementR01CA251589 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FELICIANO, ELIZABETH MARJORIE CESPEDES · 2020 to 2025
$3.5M
Beyond Body Mass Index: Bringing Body Composition into Oncology PracticeK01CA226155 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FELICIANO, ELIZABETH MARJORIE CESPEDES · 2018 to 2022
$894k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA226155NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105274NCI NIH HHS R01 CA251589NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prior research suggests a relationship between overall diet quality and breast cancer survival, although few studies have reported on this topic. We evaluated whether 4 dietary quality indices consistent with healthy eating recommendations around the time of breast cancer diagnosis were associated with risk of recurrence, cause-specific, and all-cause mortality. Methods: A total of 3660 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer were included. Diet was assessed an average of 2.3 (range = 0.7-18.7) months after diagnosis, from which 4 dietary quality indices were derived: the American Cancer Society guidelines (ACS), the alternate Mediterranean Diet Index (aMED), the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI). Over 40 888 person-years of follow-up, 461 breast cancer recurrences, and 655 deaths were ascertained. Cox models were used to estimate hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Adjusted comparisons between extreme quintiles showed all 4 dietary quality indices to be inversely associated with all-cause mortality, suggesting a 21%-27% lower risk (ACS HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.95; aMED HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.03; DASH HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.58 to 1.00; HEI HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.01). Similar patterns were noted for non-breast cancer mortality (ACS HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.48 to 0.98; aMED HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.50 to 1.05; DASH HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.79; HEI HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48 to 0.94). None of the dietary quality indices were associated with recurrence or breast cancer-specific mortality. Conclusion: Food intake patterns concordant with dietary quality indices consistent with recommendations for healthy eating may be beneficial for women with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsFood QualityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCause of DeathDietDietary Approaches To Stop HypertensionDiet, HealthyDiet, MediterraneanFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33928215
PMCPMC8062847
OpenAlexW3133757494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.