ArticleBiology methods & protocols2021
Novel metric for hyperbolic phylogenetic tree embeddings.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Distances Using the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Weighted centroid trees: a general approach to summarize phylogenies in single-labeled tumor mutation tree inference.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A machine-learning-based alternative to phylogenetic bootstrap.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Common Methods for Phylogenetic Tree Construction and Their Implementation in R.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Geometry of Low- and High-Level Perceptual Spaces.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Leaping through Tree Space: Continuous Phylogenetic Inference for Rooted and Unrooted Trees.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Fidelity of hyperbolic space for Bayesian phylogenetic inference.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Representation learning applications in biological sequence analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in experimental technologies, such as DNA sequencing, have opened up new avenues for the applications of phylogenetic methods to various fields beyond their traditional application in evolutionary investigations, extending to the fields of development, differentiation, cancer genomics, and immunogenomics. Thus, the importance of phylogenetic methods is increasingly being recognized, and the development of a novel phylogenetic approach can contribute to several areas of research. Recently, the use of hyperbolic geometry has attracted attention in artificial intelligence research. Hyperbolic space can better represent a hierarchical structure compared to Euclidean space, and can therefore be useful for describing and analyzing a phylogenetic tree. In this study, we developed a novel metric that considers the characteristics of a phylogenetic tree for representation in hyperbolic space. We compared the performance of the proposed hyperbolic embeddings, general hyperbolic embeddings, and Euclidean embeddings, and confirmed that our method could be used to more precisely reconstruct evolutionary distance. We also demonstrate that our approach is useful for predicting the nearest-neighbor node in a partial phylogenetic tree with missing nodes. Furthermore, we proposed a novel approach based on our metric to integrate multiple trees for analyzing tree nodes or imputing missing distances. This study highlights the utility of adopting a geometric approach for further advancing the applications of phylogenetic methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.