Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33928183›Full record

ArticleUrology practice2021

Interprofessional Consultations (eConsults) in Urology.

Milan Patel, Adam J Gadzinski, Alexander M Bell, Kara Watts, Emma Steppe, Anobel Y Odisho, Claire C Yang, Chad Ellimoottil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Milan PatelInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Adam J GadzinskiDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Alexander M BellDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
Kara WattsDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York.
Emma SteppeInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Anobel Y OdishoDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
Claire C YangDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Chad EllimoottilInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Funding

Improving Video Visit Adoption by SurgeonsK08HS027632 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELLIMOOTTIL, CHANDY SKARIA · 2020 to 2024
$775k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS027632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn interprofessional consultation (eConsult) is an asynchronous form of telehealth whereby a primary care provider requests electronic consultation with a specialist in place of an in-person consultation. While eConsults have been successfully implemented in many medical specialties, their use in the practice of urology is relatively unknown.

methodsWe included data from four academic institutions: University of Michigan, University of California -San Francisco, University of Washington, and Montefiore Medical Center. We included every urological eConsult performed at each institution from the launch of their respective programs through August 2019. We considered an eConsult "converted" when the participating urologist recommended a full in-person evaluation. We report eConsult conversion rate, response time, completion time, and diagnosis categories.

resultsA total of 462 urological eConsults were requested. Of these, 36% were converted to a traditional in-person visit. Among resolved eConsults, with data on provider response time available (n=119),53.8% of eConsults were addressed in less than 1 day; 28.6% in 1 day; 8.4% in 2 days; 3.4% in 3 days; 3.4% in 4 days; 1.7% in 5 days; and 0.8% in ≥6 days. Among resolved eConsults, with data on provider completion time available (n=283), 50.2% were completed in 1-10 minutes; 46.7% in 11-20 minutes; 2.8% in 21-30 minutes; and less than 1% in ≥31 minutes. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that eConsults are an effective avenue for urologists to provide recommendations for many common non-surgical urological conditions and thus avoid a traditional in-person for low-complexity situations. Further investigation into the impact of eConsults on healthcare costs and access to urological care are necessary.

Identifiers

PMID33928183
PMCPMC8078010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.