ArticleCureus2021
Factitious Disorder in Seven Patients: A Saudi Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Factitious disorder (FD) is a psychiatric disease where signs and symptoms are produced, falsified, or exaggerated consciously in the absence of clear external motivations. Through needless medical visits, costly investigatory testing, and potentially long hospital stays, patients with FD waste valuable time and resources, which affects both the patient and the healthcare system. It can be very challenging for physicians who have never encountered patients with FD to recognize them promptly as symptoms of FD vary greatly. Methodology This was a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with FD attending King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, a tertiary care military hospital and one of the most prominent academic and referral medical institutions in the country. Using the BESTCare health information system, we reviewed patients' electronic health records from January 2015 to December 2020. The diagnosis of FD was based on the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th edition. Results A total of seven patients were included in the study, of whom five (71%) were males and two (29%) were females. Of the total seven patients, three were 21 years old and younger, one was 38 years old, and three were 56 years old and older. Three (43%) patients were married and four (57%) were single. In terms of occupation, three (43%) patients were retired, one (14%) worked in a private company, one (14%) was unemployed, and two (29%) were students. A total of four (57%) patients initially presented to the Emergency Department (ED), and only three (43%) presented to the outpatient clinics. Induced disease or injury was found in five (71%) patients. Induced skin injury was found in four (57%) patients. Counseling and psychotherapy were only offered to one (14%) patient. Conclusions FD remains a rare psychiatric condition that is difficult to recognize. Despite a small sample size, FD in the present study showed a male predominance, affecting patients of all age groups. About half of the patients presented initially to the ED. Induced disease or injury was the most commonly reported pattern of clinical presentation. Induced skin injury was the most common clinical presentation found in around half of the patients. We believe that the number of FD patients in the present study is likely underreported and is expected to be higher. This highlights the need for better awareness of FD among physicians in different medical fields. We emphasize that there is a need for better professional training in the identification of FD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.