Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33927696›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2021

Step-Down of FSH- Dosage During Ovarian Stimulation - Basic Lessons to Be Learnt From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Barbara Lawrenz, Carol Coughlan, Laura Melado, Shieryl Digma, Junard Sibal, Alliza Jean, Human M Fatemi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara LawrenzIn-Vitro-Fertilisation (IVF) Department, ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Carol CoughlanIn-Vitro-Fertilisation (IVF) Department, ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Laura MeladoIn-Vitro-Fertilisation (IVF) Department, ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Shieryl DigmaIn-Vitro-Fertilisation (IVF) Department, ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Junard SibalClinical Laboratory, ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Alliza JeanClinical Laboratory, ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Human M FatemiIn-Vitro-Fertilisation (IVF) Department, ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rise in serum progesterone in the late follicular phase is a well described adverse effect of ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Previous data suggest, that enhanced gonadotropin stimulation causes progesterone elevation and the incidence of premature progesterone elevation can be reduced by declining gonadotropin dosages. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to achieve a significant reduction of the progesterone level on the day of final oocyte maturation by a daily reduction of 12.5 IU rec-FSH from a follicle size of 14 mm in a GnRH-antagonist protocol. A total of 127 patients had been recruited (Control group (CG): 62 patients; Study group (SG): 65 patients). Due to drop out, data from 108 patients (CG: 55 patients; SG: 53 patients) were included into the analysis. Patients' basic parameters, gonadotropin (Gn)-starting dose, total Gn-stimulation dosage, the number of retrieved and mature oocytes as well as in the hormonal parameters on the day of trigger (DoT) were not statistically significantly different. However, through stepwise Gn-reduction of 12.5 IU/day in the SG, there was a statistically highly significant difference in the Gn-stimulation dosage on the day of trigger (p < 0.0001) and statistically significant associations for the DoT-P4-levels with the DoT-FSH-levels for both groups (CG: p = 0.001; SG: p = 0.0045). The herein described significant associations between DoT-P4-levels and DoT-FSH-levels confirm the theory that enhanced FSH stimulation is the primary source of progesterone elevation on the day of final oocyte maturation in stimulated IVF/ICSI cycles. Given the pathophysiologic mechanism of progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation, the use of an increased FSH step-down dosage should be studied in future RCTs, despite the fact that a step-down approach of daily 12.5 IU rec-FSH did not achieve a significantly reduced progesterone level on the DoT.

Indexed as

AdultDrug Administration ScheduleEstradiolFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansLuteinizing HormoneOocytesOvulation InductionProgesteroneEstradiolFollicle Stimulating HormoneLuteinizing HormoneProgesteroneovarian stimulationprogesteroneprogesterone elevationreduction of FSH-dosagesystemic FSH level

Identifiers

PMID33927696
PMCPMC8078176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.