Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33927587›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Brain Density Clustering Analysis: A New Approach to Brain Functional Dynamics.

Ashkan Faghiri, Eswar Damaraju, Aysenil Belger, Judith M Ford, Daniel Mathalon, Sarah McEwen, Bryon Mueller, Godfrey Pearlson, Adrian Preda, Jessica A Turner and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Ashkan FaghiriThe Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia State University, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Eswar DamarajuThe Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia State University, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Aysenil BelgerDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Judith M FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Daniel MathalonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Sarah McEwenDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Bryon MuellerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Godfrey PearlsonSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Adrian PredaDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Jessica A TurnerDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jatin G VaidyaDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, United States.
Theodorus Van ErpDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Vince D CalhounThe Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia State University, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Emory University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USCenter for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science · USGeorgia State University · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
FUNCTION BIRNU24RR021992 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI POTKIN, STEVEN G · 2006 to 2010
$25.0M
BIO-INFORMATICS RESEARCH NETWORK COORDINATING CENTER (BIRN-CC)U24RR025736 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KESSELMAN, CARL · 2009 to 2011
$15.0M
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Predictive Coding Abnormalities in Psychosis: EEG and fMRIR01MH058262 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, JUDITH M · 1998 to 2018
$6.4M
Male/Female differences in psychosis and mood disorders:Dynamic imaging-genomic models for characterizing and predicting psychosis and mood dR01MH118695 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Flexible multivariate models for linking multi-scale connectome and genome data in Alzheimer's disease and related disordersRF1AG063153 · NIA · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, LIU, JINGYU · 2019 to 2020
$3.5M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
CSRD VA IK6 CX002519NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCRR NIH HHS U24 RR021992NCRR NIH HHS U24 RR025736NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG063153NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058262NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of studies in recent years have explored whole-brain dynamic connectivity using pairwise approaches. There has been less focus on trying to analyze brain dynamics in higher dimensions over time.

methodsWe introduce a new approach that analyzes time series trajectories to identify high traffic nodes in a high dimensional space. First, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are decomposed using spatial ICA to a set of maps and their associated time series. Next, density is calculated for each time point and high-density points are clustered to identify a small set of high traffic nodes. We validated our method using simulations and then implemented it on a real data set.

resultsWe present a novel approach that captures dynamics within a high dimensional space and also does not use any windowing in contrast to many existing approaches. The approach enables one to characterize and study the time series in a potentially high dimensional space, rather than looking at each component pair separately. Our results show that schizophrenia patients have a lower dynamism compared to healthy controls. In addition, we find patients spend more time in nodes associated with the default mode network and less time in components strongly correlated with auditory and sensorimotor regions. Interestingly, we also found that subjects oscillate between state pairs that show opposite spatial maps, suggesting an oscillatory pattern.

conclusionOur proposed method provides a novel approach to analyze the data in its native high dimensional space and can possibly provide new information that is undetectable using other methods.

Indexed as

brain dynamicsdensity clusteringfunctional magnetic resonance imagingindependent component analysesresting state– fMRI

Identifiers

PMID33927587
PMCPMC8076753
OpenAlexW3154300025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.