ReviewJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2021
Sequencing of Fixation in Panfacial Fracture: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Staged reconstruction of panfacial trauma involving a comminuted mandibular fracture: a case report.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2026Article
- Treatment of Post-traumatic Facial Deformities.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2023Review
- Off-Label Treatment for Severe Craniomaxillofacial Fractures in Low-Income Countries-A Novel Operation Method with the External Face Fixator.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Assessment of clinical outcome of surgically managed panfacial fractures with or without ancillary procedures. A 10-year retrospective study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn panfacial fracture management, the controversy still exists in the sequencing of fixation. The purpose of this systematic review is to establish the best sequence pattern which assists in achieving definite facial width, vertical height and anteroposterior projection.
methodsThe review was conducted according to the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent authors performed a comprehensive search of the PUBMED, EBSCO, J-Gate, SCOPUS and NDH for articles published up until December 2018. Sequence of fixation, timing of intervention, outcome, follow-up period and complications were evaluated for patients with panfacial fracture.
resultsIn total, 202 articles were identified from the databases. After screening and full text analysis, 25 studies were included in this systematic review. Nineteen studies reported bottom-to-top sequence and two studies reported top-to-bottom approach. However, four studies reported both the approaches. The follow-up period ranges from 3 weeks to 4 years.
conclusionBased on the literature support and evidence, good and satisfactory outcome achieved in "Bottom-top and outside-in" sequence when compared with other sequence pattern. Early repair of panfacial fracture is advised for proper reduction and fixation, but can be delayed in accompanying life-threatening injuries. Complications are perceptible in all the sequences; it can be avoided by definitive treatment planning and stepwise management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.