Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33927379›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2021

Retrospective analysis and reclassification of DYSF variants in a large French series of dysferlinopathy patients.

Théo Charnay, Véronique Blanck, Mathieu Cerino, Marc Bartoli, Florence Riccardi, Nathalie Bonello-Palot, Christophe Pécheux, Karine Nguyen, Nicolas Lévy, Svetlana Gorokhova and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Théo CharnayService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Véronique BlanckService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Mathieu CerinoService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Marc BartoliAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, U 1251, Marseille, France.
Florence RiccardiService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Nathalie Bonello-PalotService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Christophe PécheuxService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Karine NguyenService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Nicolas LévyService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Svetlana GorokhovaService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France. svetlana.gorokhova@univ-amu.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-4061
Martin KrahnService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France. martin.krahn@univ-amu.fr.
Inserm · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRHôpital de la Timone · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent evolution of sequencing technologies and the development of international standards in variant interpretation have profoundly changed the diagnostic approaches in clinical genetics. As a consequence, many variants that were initially claimed to be disease-causing can be now reclassified as benign or uncertain in light of the new data available. Unfortunately, the misclassified variants are still present in the scientific literature and variant databases, greatly interfering with interpretation of diagnostic sequencing results. Despite the urgent need, large-scale efforts to update the classifications of these variants are still not sufficient.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 176 DYSF gene variants that were identified in dysferlinopathy patients referred to the Marseille Medical Genetics Department for diagnostic sequencing since 2001.

resultsWe reclassified all variants into five-tier American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) pathogenicity classes, revealing changed pathogenicity for 17 variants. We then updated the information for the variants that have been previously published in the variant database and submitted 46 additional DYSF variants.

conclusionBesides direct benefit for dysferlinopathy diagnostics, our study contributes to the much needed effort to reanalyze variants from previously published cohorts and to work with curators of variant databases to update the entries for erroneously classified variants.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationMuscular Dystrophies, Limb-GirdleDysferlinGenetic TestingHumansRetrospective StudiesDysferlinDYSF protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33927379
OpenAlexW3159060468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.