Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33927308›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma.

Zhuo-Yi Liu, Song-Shan Feng, Yi-Hao Zhang, Li-Yang Zhang, Sheng-Chao Xu, Jing Li, Hui Cao, Jun Huang, Fan Fan, Li Cheng and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimal managements of elderly patients with glioblastoma.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhuo-Yi Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Song-Shan Feng *Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Yi-Hao Zhang *Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Li-Yang ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Sheng-Chao XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Jing LiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Hui CaoDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province, The Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Jun HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Fan FanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Li ChengDepartment of Emergency, Fengyang County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Jun-Yi JiangAier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Quan ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China. chengquan@csu.edu.cn.
Zhi-Xiong LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China. zhixiongliu@csu.edu.cn.
Central South University · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CNHunan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic factors and optimal treatment for the elderly patient with glioblastoma (GBM) were poorly understood. This study extracted 4975 elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with histologically confirmed GBM from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Firstly, Cumulative incidence function and cox proportional model were utilized to illustrate the interference of non-GBM related mortality in our cohort. Then, the Fine-Gray competing risk model was applied to determine the prognostic factors for GBM related mortality. Age ≥ 75 years old, white race, size > 5.4 cm, frontal lobe tumor, and overlapping lesion were independently associated with more GBM related death, while Gross total resection (GTR) (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.80-0.94, P = 0.010), radiotherapy (HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.55-0.74, P < 0.001), chemotherapy (HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.59-0.90, P = 0.003), and chemoRT (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.38-0.48, P < 0.001) were identified as independently protective factors of GBM related death. Based on this, a corresponding nomogram was conducted to predict 3-, 6- and 12-month GBM related mortality, the C-index of which were 0.763, 0.718, and 0.694 respectively. The calibration curve showed that there was a good consistency between the predicted and the actual mortality probability. Concerning treatment options, GTR followed by chemoRT is suggested as optimal treatment. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone also provide moderate clinical benefits.

Indexed as

NomogramsAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33927308
PMCPMC8084944
OpenAlexW3157648749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.