ArticleScientific reports2021
System for quantitative evaluation of DAB&H-stained breast cancer biopsy digital images (CHISEL).
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Quantification of Membrane DAB Immunohistochemical Staining in FFPE Cervical Cancer Tissues Using an Open-Source CellProfiler Pipeline.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- EpidermaQuant: Unsupervised Detection and Quantification of Epidermal Differentiation Markers on H-DAB-Stained Images of Reconstructed Human Epidermis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Software BreastAnalyser for the semi-automatic analysis of breast cancer immunohistochemical images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- High contrast breast cancer biomarker semi-quantification and immunohistochemistry imaging using upconverting nanoparticles.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents CHISEL (Computer-assisted Histopathological Image Segmentation and EvaLuation), an end-to-end system capable of quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant (breast cancer) digitized tissue samples with immunohistochemical nuclear staining of various intensity and diverse compactness. It stands out with the proposed seamless segmentation based on regions of interest cropping as well as the explicit step of nuclei cluster splitting followed by a boundary refinement. The system utilizes machine learning and recursive local processing to eliminate distorted (inaccurate) outlines. The method was validated using two labeled datasets which proved the relevance of the achieved results. The evaluation was based on the IISPV dataset of tissue from biopsy of breast cancer patients, with markers of T cells, along with Warwick Beta Cell Dataset of DAB&H-stained tissue from postmortem diabetes patients. Based on the comparison of the ground truth with the results of the detected and classified objects, we conclude that the proposed method can achieve better or similar results as the state-of-the-art methods. This system deals with the complex problem of nuclei quantification in digitalized images of immunohistochemically stained tissue sections, achieving best results for DAB&H-stained breast cancer tissue samples. Our method has been prepared with user-friendly graphical interface and was optimized to fully utilize the available computing power, while being accessible to users with fewer resources than needed by deep learning techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.