ArticleNuclear medicine communications2021
18F-FDG PET/computed tomography scan in patients with suspicion of recurrent neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix.
Article in Nuclear medicine communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the value of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) to detect recurrent cervical neuroendocrine carcinoma and its subsequent impact on patient management.
methodsA total of 25 patients who had undergone 30 18F-FDG PET/CT studies for suspected recurrent cervical neuroendocrine carcinoma (18 small cells, 2 large cells, 1 atypical carcinoid, and 4 unclassified) were retrospectively analyzed. The findings of the PET/CT images were compared with the histopathologic results in 8 scans and with clinical follow-up in 22 scans.
resultsOf the 30 PET/CT studies, 63.3% (19/30) were positive for recurrence while 36.7% (11/30) were negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting recurrent disease of cervical neuroendocrine carcinomas were 90.0, 90.0, 94.7, 81.8, and 90.0%, respectively. Metastasis to distant organs was the most common (89.4%), followed by lymph node recurrence (52.6%). Lungs were the most frequent site of distant metastasis (63.1%). 18F-FDG PET/CT findings led to the change of the management in 10 out of 25 patients (40%) by introducing the use of previously unplanned therapeutic procedures.
conclusions18F-FDG PET/CT is an efficient technique for detecting recurrent cervical neuroendocrine carcinoma, and may thus contribute to improving patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.