Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33926988›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2021

Medical Device Workarounds in Providing Care for Children With Medical Complexity in the Home.

Hanna J Barton, Ryan J Coller, Shanmugapriya Loganathar, Nawang Singhe, Mary L Ehlenbach, Barbara Katz, Gemma Warner, Michelle M Kelly, Nicole E Werner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emotional impact, burnout, and isolation among primary family caregivers of children with medical complexity.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2025
    Article
  6. Designing for caregiving networks: a case study of primary caregivers of children with medical complexity.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of Concurrent Hospice Care on Primary Care Visits Among Children in Rural Southern Appalachia.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hanna J BartonDepartments of Industrial and Systems Engineering and.
Ryan J CollerPediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; and.
Shanmugapriya LoganatharDepartments of Industrial and Systems Engineering and.
Nawang SingheDepartments of Industrial and Systems Engineering and.
Mary L EhlenbachPediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; and.
Barbara KatzFamily Voices of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Gemma WarnerPediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; and.
Michelle M KellyPediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; and.
Nicole E WernerDepartments of Industrial and Systems Engineering and nwerner3@wisc.edu.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002374 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bo Liu, Marin Leigh Schweizer · 2017 to 2026
$9.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002374NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChildren with medical complexity (CMC) are commonly assisted by medical devices, which family caregivers are responsible for managing and troubleshooting in the home. Optimizing device use by maximizing the benefits and minimizing the complications is a critical goal for CMC but is relatively unexplored. In this study, we sought to identify and describe workarounds families have developed to optimize medical device use for their needs.

methodsWe conducted 30 contextual inquiry interviews with families of CMC in homes. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for barriers and workarounds specific to medical device usage through a directed content analysis. We used observation notes and photographs to confirm and elaborate on interview findings.

resultsWe identified 4 barriers to using medical devices in the home: (1) the quantity and type of devices allotted do not meet family needs, (2) the device is not designed to be used in locations families require, (3) device use is physically or organizationally disruptive to the home, and (4) the device is not designed to fit the user. We also identified 11 categories of workarounds to the barriers.

conclusionsFamilies face many barriers in using medical devices to care for CMC. Our findings offer rich narrative and photographic data revealing the ways in which caregivers work around these barriers. Future researchers should explore the downstream effects of these ubiquitous, necessary workarounds on CMC outcomes toward developing interventions that optimize device use for families.

Indexed as

CaregiversEquipment and SuppliesHome Care ServicesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID33926988
PMCPMC8085995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.