ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021
Comparison of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging and Single-Shot TSE DWI for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal bone dual-layer detector dual-energy computed tomography for identifying cholesteatoma.European radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of multishot echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE) and non-echo-planar imaging (HASTE) diffusion-weighted imaging in cholesteatoma with an emphasis on signal intensity ratio measurementDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2024Article
- Readout-Segmented Echoplanar (RESOLVE) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging on 3T MRI in Detection of Cholesteatoma-Our Experience.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2024Article
- Comparison of image quality and quantitative parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion imaging at 3-T based on turbo spin-echo and echo-planar imaging in patients with oral cancer.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Diagnostic Performance and Image Quality between Topup-Corrected and Standard Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Performance of 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging in the quantitative diagnosis of recurrent temporal bone cholesteatoma.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Comparison of the Utility of High-Resolution CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI Fusion Images for the Localization of Cholesteatoma.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric head and neck pathologies: a multicentre international consensus paper.Neuroradiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe high diagnostic value of DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics is undisputed. This study compares the diagnostic value of readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty patients with newly suspected cholesteatoma were examined with a dedicated protocol, including readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI at 1.5T. Acquisition parameters of both diffusion-weighted sequences were as follows:
resultsTwenty-five cases of histologically confirmed cholesteatomas were included in the study group. Lesion conspicuity was higher and fewer artifacts were found when using TSE DWI (both
conclusionsThe use of TSE DWI is advisable for cholesteatoma diagnostics and preferable over readout-segmented DWI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.