Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33926748›Full record

ReviewGynecologic oncology2021

It's time to re-evaluate cervical Cancer screening after age 65.

Sarah Dilley, Warner Huh, Batel Blechter, Anne F Rositch

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06431724 (A Prospective Analysis of Adherence to National Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations in Women Age >65), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06431724 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Analysis of Adherence to National Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations in Women Age >65

TypeobservationalSponsorSarasota Memorial Health Care SystemRan2023 to 2024Enrolled300ConditionsCervical CancerArmsPatient Survey, Provider Survey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cervical Cancer Screening After Menopause.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Cancer Incidence, Survival, and Mortality by Histologic Subtype.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah DilleyCommunity Health Network, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America. Electronic address: sdilley@ecommunity.com.
Warner HuhDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Batel BlechterDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Anne F RositchDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USCommunity Health Network · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY FELLOWSHIPT32CA009314 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne E. Joshu, Meghan Bridgid Moran · 1985 to 2026
$11.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening guidelines currently recommend cessation of cervical cancer screening after age 65, despite 20% of new cervical cancer cases occurring in this age group. The US population is aging, research methodology that examines cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates has changed, and sexual behaviors and the rates at which women have hysterectomies have changed over time. Current guidelines do not adequately address these changes, and may be missing significant opportunities to prevent cervical cancer cases and deaths in older women. Furthermore, racial disparities in cervical cancer outcomes may be exacerbated by not addressing the preventive health needs of older women through cervical cancer screening.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancerCervical cancer screeningOver 65Prevention

Identifiers

PMID33926748
PMCPMC9195478
OpenAlexW3157185707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.