ArticleSurgery2021
Machine learning for the prediction of pathologic pneumatosis intestinalis.
Article in Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- To Operate or Not? Balancing Advanced Imaging, Machine Learning, and the Doctor-Patient Relationship in Complex Clinical Decision Making.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2023Article
- The spectrum of pneumatosis intestinalis in the adult. A surgical dilemma.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe radiographic finding of pneumatosis intestinalis can indicate a spectrum of underlying processes ranging from a benign finding to a life-threatening condition. Although radiographic pneumatosis intestinalis is relatively common, there is no validated clinical tool to guide surgical management.
methodsUsing a retrospective cohort of 300 pneumatosis intestinalis cases from a single institution, we developed 3 machine learning models for 2 clinical tasks: (1) the distinction of benign from pathologic pneumatosis intestinalis cases and (2) the determination of patients who would benefit from an operation. The 3 models are (1) an imaging model based on radiomic features extracted from computed tomography scans, (2) a clinical model based on clinical variables, and (3) a combination model using both the imaging and clinical variables.
resultsThe combination model achieves an area under the curve of 0.91 (confidence interval: 0.87-0.94) for task I and an area under the curve of 0.84 (confidence interval: 0.79-0.88) for task II. The combination model significantly (P < .05) outperforms the imaging model and the clinical model for both tasks. The imaging model achieves an area under the curve of 0.72 (confidence interval: 0.57-0.87) for task I and 0.68 (confidence interval: 0.61-0.74) for task II. The clinical model achieves an area under the curve of 0.87 (confidence interval: 0.83-0.91) for task I and 0.76 (confidence interval: 0.70-0.81) for task II.
conclusionThis study suggests that combined radiographic and clinical features can identify pathologic pneumatosis intestinalis and aid in patient selection for surgery. This tool may better inform the surgical decision-making process for patients with pneumatosis intestinalis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.