Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33926560›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2021

Vision loss, vision difficulty and psychological distress in South Africa: results from SANHANES-1.

Kwadwo Owusu Akuffo, Ronel Sewpaul, Samson Darrah, Natisha Dukhi, David Ben Kumah, Eldad Agyei-Manu, Emmanuel Kofi Addo, Akosua Kesewah Asare, Isaiah Osei Duah, Priscilla Reddy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Kwadwo Owusu AkuffoDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. akuffokwadwoowusu@knust.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6683-249X
Ronel SewpaulHealth & Wellbeing, Human and Social Capabilities Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2523-1222
Samson DarrahDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-1281
Natisha DukhiHealth & Wellbeing, Human and Social Capabilities Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-7424
David Ben KumahDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4634-3637
Eldad Agyei-ManuDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2712-0198
Emmanuel Kofi AddoDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3836-2950
Akosua Kesewah AsareDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-6884
Isaiah Osei DuahDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-8602
Priscilla ReddyHealth & Wellbeing, Human and Social Capabilities Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7549-9155
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHHuman Sciences Research Council · ZAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological distress in vision impairments and blindness is a complex issue and a major public health concern. Sudden adjustments in routine lifestyle and career aspirations in such persons culminate in and/or aggravate their level of stress. Yet, psychological distress in persons with visual difficulties and vision loss in South Africa is poorly understood. We investigated the association between psychological distress and self-reported vision difficulties as well as clinician-assessed vision loss using data from the South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES-1).

methodsData was analysed on participants aged ≥ 15 years who participated in the SANHANES-1 clinical examinations and interviews. Data on demographic, socio-economic, and health status variables were gathered using a structured questionnaire. Psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Vision assessment was conducted by clinicians adhering to standard protocols as well as by participants' subjective response to vision-related questions. Vision loss was defined as presenting visual acuity worse than Snellen 6/12 in the better eye. Bivariate and multiple logistic regressions were used to examine the association between vision parameters and psychological distress.

resultsThe analytic sample comprised 6859 participants with mean age of 38.4 years (60.8% females). The prevalence of psychological distress was 19.9%. After adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic, health risk and eye care variables, self-reported myopia (mild adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.7; moderate AOR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.7; severe AOR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.8-7.3) and self-reported hyperopia (mild AOR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.5; moderate AOR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.8; severe AOR = 3.5, 95% CI 1.8-6.8) were significantly associated with psychological distress. While psychological distress was higher in patients with clinician assessed vision loss than those with normal vision, the association was not statistically significant after adjusting for confounders (AOR: 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.4).

conclusionsPersons who self-reported vision difficulty experienced a higher prevalence of psychological distress. Therefore, comprehensive psychological care is needed for patients with eye disease or vision difficulties as part of a governmental strategy to provide mental health care for all South Africans.

Indexed as

BlindnessPsychological DistressAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNutrition SurveysSouth AfricaStress, PsychologicalAnxietyDepressionEmotional stress in eye diseasesMental healthVision disorders and self-esteemVision impairment and stressVision-related quality of life

Identifiers

PMID33926560
PMCPMC8082762
OpenAlexW3159939183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.