Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33926449›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Development and evaluation of the Good Grief program for young people bereaved by familial cancer.

Pandora Patterson, Fiona E J McDonald, Elizabeth Kelly-Dalgety, Bianca Lavorgna, Barbara L Jones, Anna E Sidis, Thomasin Powell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pandora PattersonCanteen Australia, GPO Box 3821, Sydney, NSW, 2001, Australia. pandora.patterson@canteen.org.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-3252
Fiona E J McDonaldCanteen Australia, GPO Box 3821, Sydney, NSW, 2001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4484-4929
Elizabeth Kelly-DalgetyCanteen Australia, GPO Box 3821, Sydney, NSW, 2001, Australia.
Bianca LavorgnaCanteen Australia, GPO Box 3821, Sydney, NSW, 2001, Australia.
Barbara L JonesSteve Hicks School of Social Work and Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-7019
Anna E SidisCanteen Australia, GPO Box 3821, Sydney, NSW, 2001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0831-6598
Thomasin PowellCanteen Australia, GPO Box 3821, Sydney, NSW, 2001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents and young adults (AYAs) bereaved by the death of a parent or sibling from cancer report unique psychosocial needs and can have difficulty adjusting to their loss. Unaddressed, this can result in poor long-term bereavement outcomes. This paper describes the development and evaluation of Good Grief - a 3-day camp-based program focused on meeting coping, social support, and respite needs of AYAs bereaved by familial cancer.

methodsOne hundred and nine Australian AYAs (68% female; age: 12-25 years, M = 16.63) participated in the evaluation. Grief intensity (Texas Revised Inventory of Grief), meaning-making (Grief and Meaning Reconstruction Inventory), trauma coping (Perceived Ability to Cope with Trauma Scale) and unmet needs (Bereaved Cancer Needs Instrument) measures were administered pre-program and 3-months post-program. Acceptability was measured after each session and at the program's conclusion. Appropriateness was measured at 3-month follow-up. Thirteen participants were interviewed three months post-program on their perceptions of the program.

resultsParticipants reported high program satisfaction, engagement with psychosocial sessions, and enjoyment of recreational activities. Significant improvements were observed in trauma coping abilities and reductions in unmet needs for managing emotions, social support, respite, future planning, and accessing information and support domains. No change was evident in grief intensity or meaning-making as measured quantitatively. Interviews supported these quantitative findings but also identified evidence of personal growth, a component of meaning-making.

conclusionsGood Grief is a highly acceptable and beneficial intervention that addresses the unique needs of AYAs bereaved by familial cancer.

Indexed as

BereavementNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAustraliaChildFemaleGriefHumansMaleParentsYoung Adultadolescentbereavementoutcomesparental cancerprogram developmentsibling canceryoung adult

Identifiers

PMID33926449
PMCPMC8083089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.