Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33926428›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

One country's journey to interoperability: Tanzania's experience developing and implementing a national health information exchange.

Alpha Nsaghurwe, Vikas Dwivedi, Walter Ndesanjo, Haji Bamsi, Moses Busiga, Edwin Nyella, Japhet Victor Massawe, Dasha Smith, Kate Onyejekwe, Jonathan Metzger and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alpha NsaghurweUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/John Snow Inc., Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Vikas DwivediUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/John Snow Inc., Arlington, USA. vikasdw@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9724-8632
Walter NdesanjoInformation, Communication and Technology (ICT) Unit, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (MOHCDGEC), Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Haji BamsiInformation, Communication and Technology (ICT) Unit, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (MOHCDGEC), Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Moses BusigaUSAID, Health System Strengthening, Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Edwin NyellaUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/John Snow Inc., Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Japhet Victor MassaweUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/John Snow Inc., Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Dasha SmithUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/John Snow Inc., Arlington, USA.
Kate OnyejekweUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/John Snow Inc., Arlington, USA.
Jonathan MetzgerCenter for Digital Health, John Snow Inc., Arlington, USA.
Patricia TaylorUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/John Snow Inc., Arlington, USA.

Funding

USAID AID-OAA-A-14-00028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobust, flexible, and integrated health information (HIS) systems are essential to achieving national and international goals in health and development. Such systems are still uncommon in most low and middle income countries. This article describes a first-phase activity in Tanzania to integrate the country's vertical health management information system with the help of an interoperability layer that enables cross-program data exchange.

methodsFrom 2014 to 2019, the Tanzanian government and partners implemented a five-step procedure based on the "Mind the GAPS" (governance, architecture, program management, and standards) framework and using both proprietary and open-source tools. In collaboration with multiple stakeholders, the team developed the system to address major data challenges via four fully documented "use case scenarios" addressing data exchange among hospitals, between services and the supply chain, across digital data systems, and within the supply chain reporting system. This work included developing the architecture for health system data exchange, putting a middleware interoperability layer in place to facilitate the exchange, and training to support use of the system and the data it generates.

resultsTanzania successfully completed the five-step procedure for all four use cases. Data exchange is currently enabled among 15 separate information systems, and has resulted in improved data availability and significant time savings. The government has adopted the health information exchange within the national strategy for health care information, and the system is being operated and managed by Tanzanian officials.

conclusionDeveloping an integrated HIS requires a significant time investment; but ultimately benefit both programs and patients. Tanzania's experience may interest countries that are developing their HIS programs.

Indexed as

Health Information ExchangeHealth Information SystemsManagement Information SystemsDeveloping CountriesHumansInformation SystemsTanzaniaArchitectureGovernanceHealthInteroperabilityStandards

Identifiers

PMID33926428
PMCPMC8086308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.