Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33926217›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2022

Where Do We Stand in Regularization for Life Science Studies?

Veronica Tozzo, Chloé-Agathe Azencott, Samuele Fiorini, Emanuele Fava, Andrea Trucco, Annalisa Barla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veronica TozzoDepartment of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering-DIBRIS, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Chloé-Agathe AzencottCentre for Computational Biology-CBIO, MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Samuele FioriniIren S.p.a, Genoa, Italy.
Emanuele FavaDepartiment of Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications Engineering, and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea TruccoDepartiment of Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications Engineering, and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Annalisa BarlaDepartment of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering-DIBRIS, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More and more biologists and bioinformaticians turn to machine learning to analyze large amounts of data. In this context, it is crucial to understand which is the most suitable data analysis pipeline for achieving reliable results. This process may be challenging, due to a variety of factors, the most crucial ones being the data type and the general goal of the analysis (e.g., explorative or predictive). Life science data sets require further consideration as they often contain measures with a low signal-to-noise ratio, high-dimensional observations, and relatively few samples. In this complex setting, regularization, which can be defined as the introduction of additional information to solve an ill-posed problem, is the tool of choice to obtain robust models. Different regularization practices may be used depending both on characteristics of the data and of the question asked, and different choices may lead to different results. In this article, we provide a comprehensive description of the impact and importance of regularization techniques in life science studies. In particular, we provide an intuition of what regularization is and of the different ways it can be implemented and exploited. We propose four general life sciences problems in which regularization is fundamental and should be exploited for robustness. For each of these large families of problems, we enumerate different techniques as well as examples and case studies. Lastly, we provide a unified view of how to approach each data type with various regularization techniques.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiological Science DisciplinesMachine Learninglife sciencesregularizationsupervised learningunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID33926217
PMCPMC8968832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.