ArticleBrain connectivity2021
Impact of Independent Component Analysis Dimensionality on the Test-Retest Reliability of Resting-State Functional Connectivity.
Article in Brain connectivity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproducibility of resting-state functional connectivity in healthy aging and brain injury: A mini-multiverse analysis.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Resting-State Functional Connectivity Explained Psychotic-like Experiences in the General Population and Partially Generalized to Patients and Relatives.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023Article
- Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Test-retest reliability of peak location in the sensorimotor network of resting state fMRI for potential rTMS targets.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.