Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33926108›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Psychological First Aid Training: A Scoping Review of Its Application, Outcomes and Implementation.

Ling Wang, Ian Norman, Tao Xiao, Yamin Li, Mary Leamy

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ling WangClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Ian NormanFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London SE1 8SW, UK.
Tao XiaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Yamin LiClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Mary LeamyFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London SE1 8SW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6396-1410
Central South University · CNKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide commitment to disseminate Psychological First Aid (PFA) training to enable frontline workers to support distressed individuals and/or manage their own self-care is increasing, but the evidence base of PFA training is uncertain.

methoda scoping review was undertaken by searching seven databases and hand-searching grey literature to maximise coverage of potential studies.

resultsTwenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Three PFA training models were commonly used in research studies. A broad selection of PFA training outcomes were observed including learning, behavior, satisfaction and practice in crisis mental and behavior health preparedness.

conclusionsResearch evidence of reasonable quality demonstrates that PFA training significantly improves knowledge of appropriate psychosocial response and PFA skills in supporting people in acute distress, thereby enhancing self-efficacy and promoting resilience. However, this review highlights inadequate guidance on how PFA training should be applied and adapted, significant shortcomings of reporting PFA training delivery, limited training evaluation and unclear training outcomes. Whilst behavioral, knowledge and system impact of the PFA training are promising, methodologically stronger evaluations which include systematic training adaptation and selection of sensitive outcome measures is needed to strengthen future implementation of PFA training and thereby enhance population preparedness for future emergencies.

Indexed as

First AidMental DisordersHumansLearningcapacity buildingearly psychosocial supporthealthcare workersmental and behavior health managementmental health and psychosocial supportmental health preparednessnon-specialistPFA trainingPsychological First Aidpsychosocial response

Identifiers

PMID33926108
PMCPMC8123604
OpenAlexW3157833059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.