Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33926002›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Use of PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncological Surgery.

Adrien Holzgreve, Nathalie L Albert, Norbert Galldiks, Bogdana Suchorska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Machine Learning and Radiomics in Gliomas.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. DeepDixon synthetic CT for [Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Role of [Cancers · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrien HolzgreveDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9566-8438
Nathalie L AlbertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Norbert GalldiksDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Bogdana SuchorskaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sana Kliniken Duisburg, 47055 Duisburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an overview of current applications and perspectives of PET imaging in neuro-oncological surgery. The past and future of PET imaging in the management of patients with glioma and brain metastases are elucidated with an emphasis on amino acid tracers, such as

Indexed as

brain metastasisFET PETglioblastomagliomameningiomaneuro-oncological surgeryneurosurgeryPET imagingsomatostatin receptor

Identifiers

PMID33926002
PMCPMC8123649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.