Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33925663›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

The Maze Pathway of Coevolution: A Critical Review over the

Lilian Motta Cantanhêde, Carlos Mata-Somarribas, Khaled Chourabi, Gabriela Pereira da Silva, Bruna Dias das Chagas, Luiza de Oliveira R Pereira, Mariana Côrtes Boité, Elisa Cupolillo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. First Report of an AsymptomaticInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. The endoplasmic reticulum of trypanosomatids: An unrevealed road for chemotherapy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  18. Analyses ofViruses · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lilian Motta CantanhêdeResearch on Leishmaniasis Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2376-4236
Carlos Mata-SomarribasResearch on Leishmaniasis Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040360, Brazil.
Khaled ChourabiResearch on Leishmaniasis Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040360, Brazil.
Gabriela Pereira da SilvaResearch on Leishmaniasis Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040360, Brazil.
Bruna Dias das ChagasResearch on Leishmaniasis Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040360, Brazil.
Luiza de Oliveira R PereiraResearch on Leishmaniasis Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-1724
Mariana Côrtes BoitéResearch on Leishmaniasis Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-6280
Elisa CupolilloResearch on Leishmaniasis Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0620-3250
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The description of the genus

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansLeishmaniaLeishmaniasisPhylogenyRNA VirusesSymbiosiscoevolutionendosymbiont protozoan virusesLeishmaniaLeishmania virusesphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID33925663
PMCPMC8146029
OpenAlexW3157292049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.