Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33925640›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Microbiological Evaluation and Sperm DNA Fragmentation in Semen Samples of Patients Undergoing Fertility Investigation.

Chiara Pagliuca, Federica Cariati, Francesca Bagnulo, Elena Scaglione, Consolata Carotenuto, Fabrizio Farina, Valeria D'Argenio, Francesca Carraturo, Paola D'Aprile, Mariateresa Vitiello and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Endometriosis and dysbiosis: State of art.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Semen dysbiosis-just a male problem?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara PagliucaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Federica CariatiCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Napoli, Italy.
Francesca BagnuloFertility Unit, Maternal-Child Department, AOU Policlinico Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Elena ScaglioneDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Consolata CarotenutoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Fabrizio FarinaDepartment of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Valeria D'ArgenioCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-3698
Francesca CarraturoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Paola D'AprileDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Mariateresa VitielloDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Ida StrinaFertility Unit, Maternal-Child Department, AOU Policlinico Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Carlo AlviggiFertility Unit, Maternal-Child Department, AOU Policlinico Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Roberta ColicchioDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4861-5085
Rossella TomaiuoloUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2828-782X
Paola SalvatoreDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITCeinge Biotecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITTecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITUniversity of Sannio · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fifteen percent of male infertility is associated with urogenital infections; several pathogens are able to alter the testicular and accessory glands' microenvironment, resulting in the impairment of biofunctional sperm parameters. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of urogenital infections on the quality of 53 human semen samples through standard analysis, microbiological evaluation, and molecular characterization of sperm DNA damage. The results showed a significant correlation between infected status and semen volume, sperm concentration, and motility. Moreover, a high risk of fragmented sperm DNA was demonstrated in the altered semen samples. Urogenital infections are often asymptomatic and thus an in-depth evaluation of the seminal sample can allow for both the diagnosis and therapy of infections while providing more indicators for male infertility management.

Indexed as

AdultDNA DamageDNA FragmentationFertilityHumansInfertility, MaleMaleSemenSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm CountSperm Motilitymale infertilitymicrobiological evaluationsperm DNA fragmentationurogenital infections

Identifiers

PMID33925640
PMCPMC8145398
OpenAlexW3159855358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.