Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33925599›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Use of Oral Contraceptives as a Potential Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies Up to 2010.

Wiesław Kanadys, Agnieszka Barańska, Maria Malm, Agata Błaszczuk, Małgorzata Polz-Dacewicz, Mariola Janiszewska, Marian Jędrych

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of lifestyle factors with breast cancer incidence: An overview of systematic reviews.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wiesław KanadysSpecialistic Medical Center "Czechów" in Lublin, 20-848 Lublin, Poland.
Agnieszka BarańskaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Statistics with E-learning Lab, Medical University, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4864-0184
Maria MalmDepartment of Medical Informatics and Statistics with E-learning Lab, Medical University, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9480-926X
Agata BłaszczukDepartment of Virology with SARS Laboratory, Medical University, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Małgorzata Polz-DacewiczDepartment of Virology with SARS Laboratory, Medical University, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Mariola JaniszewskaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Statistics with E-learning Lab, Medical University, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7116-6783
Marian JędrychDepartment of Medical Informatics and Statistics with E-learning Lab, Medical University, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1661-9583
Medical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous studies evaluating the risk of breast cancer among oral contraception users, the effect of oral contraceptive on developing breast cancer remains inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of literature with meta-analysis in order to quantitative estimate this association. The bibliographic database MEDLINE and EMBASE, and reference lists of identified articles were searched, with no language restrictions, from the start of publication to August 2010. We performed a reanalysis and overall estimate of 79 case-control studies conducted between 1960-2010, including a total of 72,030 incidents, histologically confirmed cases of breast cancer and 123,650 population/hospital controls. A decrease was observed in cancer risk in OC users before age 25 years (0.91, 0.83-1.00). However, the use of OCs before the first full-term pregnancy had a significant increased risk of breast cancer (OR, 1.14, 1.01-1.28,

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsContraceptives, OralAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansOdds RatioPregnancyRisk FactorsContraceptives, Oralbreast cancercancer riskmeta-analysisoral contraceptivesprevention

Identifiers

PMID33925599
PMCPMC8123798
OpenAlexW3159188016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.