Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33925422›Full record

ArticleToxics2021

Cellular Uptake and Toxicological Effects of Differently Sized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Intestinal Cells.

Anna Mittag, Christian Hoera, Alexander Kämpfe, Martin Westermann, Jochen Kuckelkorn, Thomas Schneider, Michael Glei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genotoxicity of nanoparticles evaluated using theJournal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna MittagDepartment of Nutritional Toxicology, Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 24, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5517-5113
Christian HoeraGerman Environment Agency, Swimming Pool Water, Chemical Analytics, Heinrich-Heine-Straße 12, 08645 Bad Elster, Germany.
Alexander KämpfeGerman Environment Agency, Swimming Pool Water, Chemical Analytics, Heinrich-Heine-Straße 12, 08645 Bad Elster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8527-1034
Martin WestermannElectron Microscopy Centre, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Ziegelmühlenweg 1, 07743 Jena, Germany.
Jochen KuckelkornGerman Environment Agency, Toxicology of Drinking Water and Swimming Pool Water, Heinrich-Heine-Straße 12, 08645 Bad Elster, Germany.
Thomas SchneiderDepartment of Nutritional Toxicology, Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 24, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8947-0911
Michael GleiDepartment of Nutritional Toxicology, Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 24, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4740-112X
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DEGerman Environment Agency · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their beneficial properties, the use of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NP) is constantly increasing, especially in consumer-related areas, such as food packaging and food additives, which is leading to an increased oral uptake of ZnO NP. Consequently, the aim of our study was to investigate the cellular uptake of two differently sized ZnO NP (<50 nm and <100 nm; 12-1229 µmol/L) using two human intestinal cell lines (Caco-2 and LT97) and to examine the possible resulting toxic effects. ZnO NP (<50 nm and <100 nm) were internalized by both cell lines and led to intracellular changes. Both ZnO NP caused time- and dose-dependent cytotoxic effects, especially at concentrations of 614 µmol/L and 1229 µmol/L, which was associated with an increased rate of apoptotic and dead cells. ZnO NP < 100 nm altered the cell cycle of LT97 cells but not that of Caco-2 cells. ZnO NP < 50 nm led to the formation of micronuclei in LT97 cells. The Ames test revealed no mutagenicity for both ZnO NP. Our results indicate the potential toxicity of ZnO NP after oral exposure, which should be considered before application.

Indexed as

apoptosisCaco-2cell cyclecytotoxicitygenotoxicityLT97nanoparticleszinc oxide

Identifiers

PMID33925422
PMCPMC8146923
OpenAlexW3159628056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.