Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33925384›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Routine Health Information Systems in the European Context: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Francesc Saigí-Rubió, José Juan Pereyra-Rodríguez, Joan Torrent-Sellens, Hans Eguia, Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat, David Novillo-Ortiz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Promoting telemedicine in Latin America in light of COVID-19.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesc Saigí-RubióFaculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), 08018 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9616-1551
José Juan Pereyra-RodríguezDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6843-5877
Joan Torrent-SellensInterdisciplinary Research Group on ICTs, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6071-422X
Hans EguiaFaculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), 08018 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-8559
Natasha Azzopardi-MuscatDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
David Novillo-OrtizDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-0984

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The aim of this study is to provide a better understanding of the requirements to improve routine health information systems (RHISs) for the management of health systems, including the identification of best practices, opportunities, and challenges in the 53 countries and territories of the WHO European region. (2) Methods: We conducted an overview of systematics reviews and searched the literature in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science electronic databases. After a meticulous screening, we identified 20 that met the inclusion criteria, and RHIS evaluation results were presented according to the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) framework. (3) Results: The reviews were published between 2007 and 2020, focusing on the use of different systems or technologies and aimed to analyze interventions on professionals, centers, or patients' outcomes. All reviews examined showed variability in results in accordance with the variability of interventions and target populations. We have found different areas for improvement for RHISs according to the three determinants of the PRISM framework that influence the configuration of RHISs: technical, organizational, or behavioral elements. (4) Conclusions: RHIS interventions in the European region are promising. However, new global and international strategies and the development of tools and mechanisms should be promoted to highly integrate platforms among European countries.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsEuropeHumansInformation ManagementInformation SystemsSystematic Reviews as Topichealth management information systemhealth system performanceroutine health information system

Identifiers

PMID33925384
PMCPMC8123776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.