ArticleCancers2021
Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal.
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidisciplinary attitudes towards LLM-structured oncologic CT reports: a prospective fixed-sequence questionnaire study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Proposal and clinical application of a structured standardized report for lumbosacral MRI integrated with a comprehensive grading system for lumbar stenosis.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Structured Versus Non-Structured Reporting of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Imaging: A Systematic Review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Impact of rectal cancer multidisciplinary conferences on patient care plans.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- Predictive Utility of Structured MRI Reporting for Rectal Cancer Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Peritoneal reflection involvement as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Long-term oncological outcomes from a prospective study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Observational
- The role of superior hemorrhoidal vein ectasia in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: CT Findings, Classifications, and a Proposal of a Structured Reporting Template.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology-update 2023.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Diagnostic Performance of Selected MRI-Derived Radiomics Able to Discriminate Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients with Midline Glioma and the H3F3AK27M Mutation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Structured reporting of computed tomography in the polytrauma patient assessment: a Delphi consensus proposal.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence.Biology · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence and radiomics in magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: a review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Review
- Structured Reporting in Radiological Settings: Pitfalls and Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Value of Clinical Information on Radiology Reports in Oncological Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in abdominal oncological setting: why and when.Infectious agents and cancer · 2022Review
- Complications Risk Assessment and Imaging Findings of Thermal Ablation Treatment in Liver Cancers: What the Radiologist Should Expect.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStructured reporting (SR) in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. The aim of this study was to build MRI-based structured reports for rectal cancer (RC) staging and restaging in order to provide clinicians all critical tumor information. MATERIALS AND
methodsA panel of radiologist experts in abdominal imaging, called the members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. The modified Delphi process was used to build the SR and to assess the level of agreement in all sections. The Cronbach's alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess the internal consistency of each section and to measure the quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also evaluated.
resultsAfter the second Delphi round of the SR RC staging, the panelists' single scores and sum of scores were 3.8 (range 2-4) and 169, and the SR RC restaging panelists' single scores and sum of scores were 3.7 (range 2-4) and 148, respectively. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.79 for SR staging and 0.81 for SR restaging. The ICCs for the SR RC staging and restaging were 0.78 (
conclusionsThe final version of the structured reports of MRI-based RC staging and restaging should be a helpful and promising tool for clinicians in managing cancer patients properly. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.