Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33925235›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2021

Fluorophores Use in Pituitary Surgery: A Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Appraisal.

Daniele Bongetta, Fulvio Tartara, Fabio Pagella, Teresa Somma, Marilou Cavaliere, Giuseppe Di Perna, Francesco Zenga, Fabio Cofano, Diego Garbossa, Cesare Zoia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniele BongettaNeurosurgery Unit, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 20131 Milano, Italy.
Fulvio TartaraNeurosurgery Unit, Istituto Clinico Città Studi, 20131 Milano, Italy.
Fabio PagellaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Teresa SommaDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Marilou CavaliereNeurosurgery Unit, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 20131 Milano, Italy.
Giuseppe Di PernaNeurosurgery Unit, AOC Città della Scienza e della Salute, 10127 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7381-9194
Francesco ZengaNeurosurgery Unit, AOC Città della Scienza e della Salute, 10127 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5440-3276
Fabio CofanoDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, 10127 Turin, Italy.
Diego GarbossaNeurosurgery Unit, AOC Città della Scienza e della Salute, 10127 Turin, Italy.
Cesare ZoiaNeurosurgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7304-6120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Despite many surgical and technological advances, pituitary adenoma surgery is still burdened by non-negligible rates of incomplete tumor resection, mainly due to difficulties in differentiating pathology from normal pituitary tissue. Some fluorescent agents have been recently investigated as intraoperative contrast agents in pituitary surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the actual knowledge about the usefulness of such fluorophores with a particular focus on both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics issues of the pituitary gland. (2) Methods: We reviewed the current literature about fluorophores use in pituitary surgery and reported the first fully endoscopic experience with fluorescein. (3) Results: The studies investigating 5-ALA use reported contrasting results. ICG showed encouraging results, although with some specificity issues in identifying pathological tissue. Low-dose fluorescein showed promising results in differentiating pathology from normal pituitary tissue. Apart from the dose and timing of administration, both the fluorophores' volume of distribution and the histological variability of the interstitial space and vascular density played a crucial role in optimizing intraoperative contrast enhancement. (4) Conclusions: Both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics issues determine the potential usefulness of fluorophores in pituitary surgery. ICG and fluorescein showed the most promising results, although further studies are needed.

Indexed as

5-ALAfluoresceinICGpituitary surgery

Identifiers

PMID33925235
PMCPMC8146254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.