Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33925078›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Development and Implementation of 'Just Right' Physical Behavior in Industrial Work Based on the Goldilocks Work Principle-A Feasibility Study.

Anders Fritz Lerche, Svend Erik Mathiassen, Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Leon Straker, Karen Søgaard, Andreas Holtermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anders Fritz LercheThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3199-6571
Svend Erik MathiassenCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1443-6211
Charlotte Lund RasmussenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2193-5019
Leon StrakerSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7786-4128
Karen SøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3968-6364
Andreas HoltermannThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4825-5697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Goldilocks Work Principle expresses that productive work should be redesigned to comprise physical behaviors of different intensities in a composition promoting workers' health and fitness. This study is the first to assess the feasibility of redesigning work in an industrial setting according to the Goldilocks Work Principle. We recruited workers (

Indexed as

Occupational HealthWorkplaceExerciseFatigueFeasibility StudiesHumansGoldilocks Work Principlehealthinterventionphysical behaviorworkplace

Identifiers

PMID33925078
PMCPMC8125316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.