Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33925011›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Anaerobic Digestion and Removal of Sulfamethoxazole, Enrofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin and Their Antibiotic Resistance Genes in a Full-Scale Biogas Plant.

Andrea Visca, Anna Barra Caracciolo, Paola Grenni, Luisa Patrolecco, Jasmin Rauseo, Giulia Massini, Valentina Mazzurco Miritana, Francesca Spataro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Impact of Anthropogenic Activities on the Dissemination of ARGs in the Environment-A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea ViscaWater Research Institute, National Research Council (IRSA-CNR), 00010 Montelibretti, Italy.
Anna Barra CaraccioloWater Research Institute, National Research Council (IRSA-CNR), 00010 Montelibretti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4986-5641
Paola GrenniWater Research Institute, National Research Council (IRSA-CNR), 00010 Montelibretti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-603X
Luisa PatroleccoInstitute of Polar Sciences, National Research Council (ISP-CNR), 00010 Montelibretti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9715-9450
Jasmin RauseoInstitute of Polar Sciences, National Research Council (ISP-CNR), 00010 Montelibretti, Italy.
Giulia MassiniDepartment of Energy Technologies, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2120-8962
Valentina Mazzurco MiritanaWater Research Institute, National Research Council (IRSA-CNR), 00010 Montelibretti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4115-8328
Francesca SpataroInstitute of Polar Sciences, National Research Council (ISP-CNR), 00010 Montelibretti, Italy.
National Research Council · ITWater Research Institute · ITNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is one of the best ways to re-use animal manure and agricultural residues, through the production of combustible biogas and digestate. However, the use of antibiotics for preventing and treating animal diseases and, consequently, their residual concentrations in manure, could introduce them into anaerobic digesters. If the digestate is applied as a soil fertilizer, antibiotic residues and/or their corresponding antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) could reach soil ecosystems. This work investigated three common soil emerging contaminants, i.e., sulfamethoxazole (SMX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), enrofloxacin (ENR), their ARGs

Indexed as

antibioticsARGsdegradationdigestatefluoroquinolonessulfonamideszootechnical waste

Identifiers

PMID33925011
PMCPMC8146758
OpenAlexW3158828942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.