Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924803›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2021

Pathogenesis of Retraction Pocket of the Tympanic Membrane-A Narrative Review.

Milan Urík, Miroslav Tedla, Pavel Hurník

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Endoscopic ear surgery in the treatment of chronic otitis media with atelectasis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Effect of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease on Middle Ear Function: A Case-Control Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Milan UríkDepartment of Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University in Brno, University Hospital Brno, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2872-185X
Miroslav TedlaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comenius University, University Hospital, 85107 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Pavel HurníkInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Ostrava, 70852 Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

Masaryk University MUNI/A/1118/2020Ministry of Health, Czech Republic FNBr, 65269705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several theories describe the development of the retraction pocket of the tympanic membrane (RP). Many authors suggest that the negative middle ear pressure is the main reason responsible for developing this condition. A narrative review has been undertaken, and conclusions are drawn reflecting a current knowledge with our new observations in the histological and immunohistochemical study. Recent studies show the important role of inflammation in the development and progression of RP. A review of the available literature shows that the inflammation plays a key role in pathogenesis of the RP and its progression to the cholesteatoma. We support this statement with our new results from histological and immunohistochemical analysis of the RPs.

Indexed as

Cholesteatoma, Middle EarTympanic MembraneHumansInflammationcholesteatomachronic otitis mediapathogenesispathologyretraction pockettympanic membrane

Identifiers

PMID33924803
PMCPMC8147081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.