Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924756›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Cellulose Nanofibres Production Routes from Virgin and Recycled Raw Materials.

Paola Gallo Stampino, Laura Riva, Carlo Punta, Graziano Elegir, Daniele Bussini, Giovanni Dotelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paola Gallo StampinoPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "G.Natta", p.zza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Laura RivaPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "G.Natta", p.zza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-6092
Carlo PuntaPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "G.Natta", p.zza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7239-9554
Graziano ElegirInnovhub Stazioni Sperimentali per l'Industria S.r.l., Via Giuseppe Colombo 83, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Daniele BussiniInnovhub Stazioni Sperimentali per l'Industria S.r.l., Via Giuseppe Colombo 83, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Giovanni DotelliPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "G.Natta", p.zza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1876-9881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanocellulose-based materials are attracting an increasing interest for the positive role they could play in sustainable development; being originated from renewable resources. Moreover, cellulose has a high potential of recycling from both post-consumer waste and industrial waste. Both factors, i.e., recyclability and renewable resources; results are also extremely favourable in the perspective of circular economy. Despite all these positive aspects, an industrial production has yet to start. At the lab scale, many preparation methods of cellulose nanofibres (CNF) are available; here, the three most common are analysed: (1) enzymatic pre-treatment followed by homogenisation (ENZHO), (2) oxidative pre-treatment combined with homogenisation (TOHO) or (3) oxidative pre-treatment followed by sonication (TOSO). All three processes have been experimentally carried out starting from both virgin and recycled cellulose from industrial waste sludge. The environmental sustainability of these three routes is estimated by the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) using experimental lab scale data. In this scenario, the comparative LCA has pointed out a superior performance of the ENZHO process, followed by TOHO and, lastly, by TOSO. The influence of energy consumption on the final results has been further investigated by a sensitivity analysis, showing that the TOHO and TOSO routes could reach similar performances by scaling-up the process from the laboratory. The different typology of CNF obtained by conducting the ENZHO process with respect to the TEMPO-mediated oxidation approach is also outlined as an additional element to be considered for the final selection of a suitable process.

Indexed as

cellulose nanofibresENZHOLCAnanocelluloseTEMPO-mediated oxidationTOHOTOSO

Identifiers

PMID33924756
PMCPMC8125706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.