ArticleGenes2021
Deepening of In Silico Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Detection RT-qPCR Assays in the Context of New Variants.
Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Variant Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Positive Specimens Using a Direct PCR Product Sequencing Surveillance (DPPSS) Method.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- RT-qPCR Testing and Performance Metrics in the COVID-19 Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Development of a Droplet Digital PCR to Monitor SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant BA.2 in Wastewater Samples.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Article
- In silico evaluation of the impact of Omicron variant of concern sublineage BA.4 and BA.5 on the sensitivity of RT-qPCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection using whole genome sequencing.Journal of medical virology · 2023Article
- A two-step process for in silico screening to assess the performance of qRTPCR kits against variant strains of SARS-CoV-2.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF Diagnostic Target Performance Reflects Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Variant Diversity in New York City.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2022Article
- Nationwide Harmonization Effort for Semi-Quantitative Reporting of SARS-CoV-2 PCR Test Results in Belgium.Viruses · 2022Article
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Variants on the Analytical Sensitivity of rRT-PCR Assays.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
- Rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 challenges human defenses.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Robust clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants by RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF multitarget approach.Journal of medical virology · 2022Article
- A deletion in the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 may reduce test sensitivity for detection of SARS-CoV-2.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2022Article
- SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR assays: In vitro comparison of 4 WHO approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence.Virology journal · 2022Article
- Identification of Hotspot Mutations in the N Gene of SARS-CoV-2 in Russian Clinical Samples That May Affect the Detection by Reverse Transcription-PCR.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assessment of Mutations Associated With Genomic Variants of SARS-CoV-2: RT-qPCR as a Rapid and Affordable Tool to Monitoring Known Circulating Variants in Chile, 2021.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Mutations on PCR Assay Sequence Alignment.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- RT-qPCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in wastewater reveals compromised vaccination-induced immunity.Water research · 2021Article
- Strategy to Develop and Evaluate a Multiplex RT-ddPCR in Response to SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Evolution.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Advanta Dx SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Assay, a High-Throughput Extraction-Free Diagnostic Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Saliva: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get.La Medicina del lavoro · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For 1 year now, the world is undergoing a coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The most widely used method for COVID-19 diagnosis is the detection of viral RNA by RT-qPCR with a specific set of primers and probe. It is important to frequently evaluate the performance of these tests and this can be done first by an in silico approach. Previously, we reported some mismatches between the oligonucleotides of publicly available RT-qPCR assays and SARS-CoV-2 genomes collected from GISAID and NCBI, potentially impacting proper detection of the virus. In the present study, 11 primers and probe sets investigated during the first study were evaluated again with 84,305 new SARS-CoV-2 unique genomes collected between June 2020 and January 2021. The lower inclusivity of the China CDC assay targeting the gene N has continued to decrease with new mismatches detected, whereas the other evaluated assays kept their inclusivity above 99%. Additionally, some mutations specific to new SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern were found to be located in oligonucleotide annealing sites. This might impact the strategy to be considered for future SARS-CoV-2 testing. Given the potential threat of the new variants, it is crucial to assess if they can still be correctly targeted by the primers and probes of the RT-qPCR assays. Our study highlights that considering the evolution of the virus and the emergence of new variants, an in silico (re-)evaluation should be performed on a regular basis. Ideally, this should be done for all the RT-qPCR assays employed for SARS-CoV-2 detection, including also commercial tests, although the primer and probe sequences used in these kits are rarely disclosed, which impedes independent performance evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.