Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924545›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

OTUs and ASVs Produce Comparable Taxonomic and Diversity from Shrimp Microbiota 16S Profiles Using Tailored Abundance Filters.

Rodrigo García-López, Fernanda Cornejo-Granados, Alonso A Lopez-Zavala, Andrés Cota-Huízar, Rogerio R Sotelo-Mundo, Bruno Gómez-Gil, Adrian Ochoa-Leyva

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rodrigo García-LópezDepartamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología (IBT), Universidad Nacional, Autónoma de México (UNAM) Avenida Universidad #2001, Colonia Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6713-8085
Fernanda Cornejo-GranadosDepartamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología (IBT), Universidad Nacional, Autónoma de México (UNAM) Avenida Universidad #2001, Colonia Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8860-0996
Alonso A Lopez-ZavalaDepartamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad de Sonora (UNISON), Blvd., Rosales y Luis, Encinas, Hermosillo, Sonora 83000, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9843-3709
Andrés Cota-HuízarCamarones el Renacimiento S.P.R. de R.I. Justino Rubio 26, Colonia Ejidal, Higuera de Zaragoza, Sinaloa 81330, Mexico.
Rogerio R Sotelo-MundoLaboratorio de Estructura Biomolecular, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C. Hermosillo, Sonora 83304, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5543-6889
Bruno Gómez-GilCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C. Mazatlán, Sinaloa 82100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3695-3597
Adrian Ochoa-LeyvaDepartamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología (IBT), Universidad Nacional, Autónoma de México (UNAM) Avenida Universidad #2001, Colonia Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4701-2303
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo · MXUniversidad de Sonora · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interplay between shrimp immune system, its environment, and microbiota contributes to the organism's homeostasis and optimal production. The metagenomic composition is typically studied using 16S rDNA profiling by clustering amplicon sequences into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and, more recently, amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Establish the compatibility of the taxonomy, α, and β diversity described by both methods is necessary to compare past and future shrimp microbiota studies. Here, we used identical sequences to survey the V3 16S hypervariable-region using 97% and 99% OTUs and ASVs to assess the hepatopancreas and intestine microbiota of

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsBacteriaComputational BiologyDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHepatopancreasHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaPenaeidaePhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S profilingASVsclustering methodsdenoisingOTUsshrimp microbiota

Identifiers

PMID33924545
PMCPMC8070570
OpenAlexW3157021351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.