Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924494›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

To Adapt or Not to Adapt: The Association between Implementation Fidelity and the Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education.

Louise Schinckus, Stephan Van den Broucke, Gerard van der Zanden, Diane Levin-Zamir, Gabriele Mueller, Henna Riemenschneider, Victoria Hayter, Lucy Yardley, Dean Schillinger, Gerardine Doyle and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Louise SchinckusCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, 1020 Brussels, Belgium.
Stephan Van den BrouckePsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Gerard van der ZandenPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Diane Levin-ZamirSchool of Public Health, University of Haifa and Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv 62098, Israel.
Gabriele MuellerFaculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Henna RiemenschneiderFaculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Victoria HayterCentre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, University of Southampton, High Field, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-2855
Lucy YardleyCentre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, University of Southampton, High Field, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Dean SchillingerDepartment of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, UCSF Box 1364, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
Gerardine DoyleCollege of Business and Geary Institute for Public Policy, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8516-4431
Kristin GanahlAKS Gesundheit GmbH, 6900 Bregenz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7322-6754
Jürgen PelikanGesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG), 1010 Wien, Austria.
Peter ChangDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Lukang, Changhua 505, Taiwan and Department of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City 40201, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6651-3624
Gesundheit Österreich · ATUCLouvain · BEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Southampton · GBCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann · BEChang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital · TWClalit Health Services · ILUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

ZIDOVUDINE &LAMIVUDINE &NEVIRAPINE COMBINATION THERAPY IN HIV 1 INFM01RR001271 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KESSLER, DAVID A · 1985 to 2006
$22.7M
Research BaseP30DK063720 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KRUMMEL, MATTHEW F · 2003 to 2019
$21.8M
UCSF Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK098722 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHRISTIAN VAISSE · 2015 to 2026
$14.6M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR001271NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK063720NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK098722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-management education (SME) is a key determinant of diabetes treatment outcomes. While SME programs are often adapted for implementation, the impact of adaptations on diabetes SME effectiveness is not well documented. This study evaluated the impact of the implementation fidelity of diabetes SME programs on program effectiveness, exploring which factors influence implementation fidelity. Data from 33 type 2 diabetes SME program providers and 166 patients were collected in 8 countries (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, UK, Israel, Taiwan and USA). Program providers completed a questionnaire assessing their adherence to the program protocol and factors that influenced the implementation. Patients answered a pre-post questionnaire assessing their diabetes-related health literacy, self-care behavior, general health and well-being. Associations between implementation fidelity and outcomes were estimated through logistic regressions and repeated measures MANOVA, controlling for potential confounders. Adaptations of the program protocol regarding content, duration, frequency and/or coverage were reported by 39% of the providers and were associated with better, not worse, outcomes than strict adherence. None of the factors related to the participants, facilitating strategies, provider or context systematically influenced the implementation fidelity. Future research should focus on individual and contextual factors that may influence decisions to adapt SME programs for diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Self-ManagementAustriaBelgiumGermanyHumansIrelandIsraelProgram EvaluationTaiwanadaptationadherencediabetesimplementation fidelityintervention effectivenessself-management education

Identifiers

PMID33924494
PMCPMC8069177
OpenAlexW3155406710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.