Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924464›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2021

Rootstocks Shape Their Microbiome-Bacterial Communities in the Rhizosphere of Different Grapevine Rootstocks.

Leonie Dries, Simone Bussotti, Carlo Pozzi, Robert Kunz, Sylvia Schnell, Otmar Löhnertz, Anne Vortkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leonie DriesDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2535-7228
Simone BussottiDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0036-8406
Carlo PozziDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Robert KunzDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany.
Sylvia SchnellResearch Center for BioSystems, Land Use, and Nutrition (IFZ), Institute of Applied Microbiology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3903-6089
Otmar LöhnertzDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany.
Anne VortkampREACH EUREGIO Start-up Center, University of Muenster, 48151 Muenster, Germany.

Funding

Forschungsring des Deutschen Weinbaus 61 40-00001/2018-021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiota associated with the rhizosphere is responsible for crucial processes. Understanding how the plant and its bacterial community interact is of great importance to face the upcoming agricultural and viticultural challenges. The composition of the bacterial communities associated with the rhizosphere of grapevines is the result of the interaction between many drivers: biogeography, edaphic factors, soil management and plant genotype. The experimental design of this study aimed to reduce the variability resulting from all factors except the genotype of the rootstock. This was made possible by investigating four ungrafted grapevine rootstock varieties of the same age, grown on the same soil under the same climatic conditions and managed identically. The bacterial communities associated with the rhizosphere of the rootstocks 1103 Paulsen, 140 Ruggeri, 161-49 Couderc and Kober 5BB were characterized with the amplicon based sequencing technique, targeting regions V4-V5 of 16S rRNA gene. Linear discriminant analysis effect Size (LEfSe) analysis was performed to determine differential abundant taxa. The four rootstocks showed similarities concerning the structure of the bacteria assemblage (richness and evenness). Nonetheless, differences were detected in the composition of the bacterial communities. Indeed, all investigated rootstocks recruited communities with distinguishable traits, thus confirming the role of rootstock genotype as driver of the bacteria composition.

Indexed as

metabarcode sequencingmicrobiotasoilvineyard soilviticulture

Identifiers

PMID33924464
PMCPMC8070248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.