Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924415›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Hot Topics on Fertility Preservation for Women and Girls-Current Research, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Possibilities.

Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg, Xia Hao, Anna Marklund, Gry Johansen, Birgit Borgström, Frida E Lundberg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Fertility preservation in female cancer patients in Brazil: perceptions and attitudes of infertility specialists.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenny A Rodriguez-WallbergDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-6181
Xia HaoDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna MarklundDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden.
Gry JohansenDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden.
Birgit BorgströmDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden.
Frida E LundbergDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7061-7178
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fertility preservation is a novel clinical discipline aiming to protect the fertility potential of young adults and children at risk of infertility. The field is evolving quickly, enriched by advances in assisted reproductive technologies and cryopreservation methods, in addition to surgical developments. The best-characterized target group for fertility preservation is the patient population diagnosed with cancer at a young age since the bulk of the data indicates that the gonadotoxicity inherent to most cancer treatments induces iatrogenic infertility. Since improvements in cancer therapy have resulted in increasing numbers of long-term survivors, survivorship issues and the negative impact of infertility on the quality of life have come to the front line. These facts are reflected in an increasing number of scientific publications referring to clinical medicine and research in the field of fertility preservation. Cryopreservation of gametes, embryos, and gonadal tissue has achieved quality standards for clinical use, with the retrieval of gonadal tissue for cryopreservation being currently the only method feasible in prepubertal children. Additionally, the indications for fertility preservation beyond cancer are also increasing since a number of benign diseases and chronic conditions either require gonadotoxic treatments or are associated with premature follicle depletion. There are many remaining challenges, and current research encompasses clinical health care and caring sciences, ethics, societal, epidemiological, experimental studies, etc.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologycancerchemotherapycryopreservationfertility preservationgenetic conditionsinfertilityobstetric outcomepremature gonadal failurereproductive epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID33924415
PMCPMC8069871
OpenAlexW3156366157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.