Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924381›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Current Practice and Future Directions.

Gloria Paz Contreras Yametti, Talia H Ostrow, Sylwia Jasinski, Elizabeth A Raetz, William L Carroll, Nikki A Evensen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Post-Transplant Relapse in Acute Leukemia: Comparative Value of MRD and Chimerism.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genetic alterations in lymphoblastic leukaemiaMedizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gloria Paz Contreras YamettiDivision of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8464-035X
Talia H OstrowDepartment of Pediatric and Pathology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, Smillow 1211, 560 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Sylwia JasinskiDivision of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Elizabeth A RaetzDivision of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.
William L CarrollDivision of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Nikki A EvensenDepartment of Pediatric and Pathology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, Smillow 1211, 560 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8090-0986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer and advances in its clinical and laboratory biology have grown exponentially over the last few decades. Treatment outcome has improved steadily with over 90% of patients surviving 5 years from initial diagnosis. This success can be attributed in part to the development of a risk stratification approach to identify those subsets of patients with an outstanding outcome that might qualify for a reduction in therapy associated with fewer short and long term side effects. Likewise, recognition of patients with an inferior prognosis allows for augmentation of therapy, which has been shown to improve outcome. Among the clinical and biological variables known to impact prognosis, the kinetics of the reduction in tumor burden during initial therapy has emerged as the most important prognostic variable. Specifically, various methods have been used to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) with flow cytometric and molecular detection of antigen receptor gene rearrangements being the most common. However, many questions remain as to the optimal timing of these assays, their sensitivity, integration with other variables and role in treatment allocation of various ALL subgroups. Importantly, the emergence of next generation sequencing assays is likely to broaden the use of these assays to track disease evolution. This review will discuss the biological basis for utilizing MRD in risk assessment, the technical approaches and limitations of MRD detection and its emerging applications.

Indexed as

acute lymphoblastic leukemiaclinical significanceddPCRflow cytometryminimal residual diseasenext generation sequencingPCR

Identifiers

PMID33924381
PMCPMC8069391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.