Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924217›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Disposal Behavior of Used Masks during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Moroccan Community: Potential Environmental Impact.

Nezha Mejjad, El Khalil Cherif, Antonio Rodero, Dorota Anna Krawczyk, Jauad El Kharraz, Aniss Moumen, Mourad Laqbaqbi, Ahmed Fekri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Effects of UV radiation on natural and synthetic materials.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nezha MejjadLaboratory of Applied Geology, Geomatics, and Environment, Ben M'sik Faculty of Sciences, Casablanca 20670, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-6750-6781
El Khalil CherifLaboratory of Chemistry Research Unit (CIQUP), Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.
Antonio RoderoSchool of Engineering Sciences of Belmez, University of Cordoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0152-620X
Dorota Anna KrawczykFaculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3118-2236
Jauad El KharrazGlobal Change Unit, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6880-1259
Aniss MoumenNational School of Applied Sciences of Kenitra, University of Ibn Tofail, Kenitra 14000, Morocco.
Mourad LaqbaqbiLaboratory of Advanced Materials and Process Engineering, Multidisciplinary Faculty Of Sidi Kacem, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra 14000, Morocco.
Ahmed FekriLaboratory of Applied Geology, Geomatics, and Environment, Ben M'sik Faculty of Sciences, Casablanca 20670, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) levied on the Moroccan authorities to increase their mask production capacity, which reached up to 12 million facemask units produced per day. This increase in personal protective equipment (PPE) production and consumption is an efficient tool to address the spread of COVID-19. However, this results in more plastic and microplastic debris being added into the land and marine environments, which will harm the ecosystem, wildlife, and public health. Such a situation needs deep individual behavior observation and tracking, as well as an assessment of the potential environmental impact of this new type of waste. For this reason, we assessed the Moroccan population's behavior regarding the use and disposal of facemasks and gloves. An exploratory survey was prepared and shared via social media and email with the population of Rabat-Salé-Kénitra and Casablanca-Settat regions. Additionally, we calculated the estimated number and weight of daily and weekly PPE used and generated by the studied regions. The survey showed that 70% of the respondents threw their discarded masks and gloves in house trash or trash bins after their first use, whereas nearly 30% of respondents admitted that they did not wear masks because they did not leave their homes during the lockdown, while from the 70% of facemask users, more than five million (equivalent to 40,000 kg) of facemasks would be generated and disposed of daily by the community of these regions, which presents 35% of the total engendered facemask waste in Morocco. Accordingly, the environment impact of facemasks showed that the greenhouse gas footprint is about 640 kT CO

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlEcosystemHumansMasksMoroccoPersonal Protective EquipmentPlasticsSARS-CoV-2PlasticsbehaviorCOVID-19environmental impactfacemasksMoroccoplastic pollutionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID33924217
PMCPMC8074620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.