Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924080›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Fourteen-Day Gemcitabine-Docetaxel Chemotherapy Is Effective and Safer Compared to 21-Day Regimen in Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma.

Minggui Pan, Maily K Trieu, Manpreet Sidhu, Jeanette Yu, Tiffany Seto, Kristen Ganjoo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  5. Treatment of De-Differentiated Liposarcoma in the Era of Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Minggui PanDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8368-6524
Maily K TrieuDepartment of Drug Utilization, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
Manpreet SidhuDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Kaiser Permanente, Roseville, CA 95661, USA.
Jeanette YuDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA 94611, USA.
Tiffany SetoOncology and Hematology Fellowship Program, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
Kristen GanjooDivision of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Roseville Medical Center · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gemcitabine-docetaxel (G-D) combination is an effective chemotherapy for patients with advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma, first developed with G administered on days 1 and 8, and D on day 8 every 21 days and later modified to be administered every 14 days in 2012. The 14-day regimen has become increasingly adopted. However, its efficacy and toxicities have not been compared. We identified 161 patients with metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma treated with either a 14-day or 21-day regimen within Northern California Kaiser Permanente from 1 January 2017 to 30 July 2020 and compared the outcomes and toxicity profiles of patients treated with the either regimen. Seventy-nine (49%) and 82 (51%) patients received the 14-day and the 21-day regimen, respectively, with similar response rate (22.8% and 15.8%,

Indexed as

docetaxelgemcitabinegenomic alterationssarcomasurvival

Identifiers

PMID33924080
PMCPMC8074251
OpenAlexW3154227494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.