Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33924045›Full record

ArticleCells2021

The Impact of Preprocessing Methods for a Successful Prostate Cell Lines Discrimination Using Partial Least Squares Regression and Discriminant Analysis Based on Fourier Transform Infrared Imaging.

Danuta Liberda, Ewa Pięta, Katarzyna Pogoda, Natalia Piergies, Maciej Roman, Paulina Koziol, Tomasz P Wrobel, Czeslawa Paluszkiewicz, Wojciech M Kwiatek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danuta LiberdaInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9804-7410
Ewa PiętaInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-0284
Katarzyna PogodaInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.
Natalia PiergiesInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.
Maciej RomanInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.
Paulina KoziolInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.
Tomasz P WrobelInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2053-0570
Czeslawa PaluszkiewiczInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.
Wojciech M KwiatekInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.

Funding

Foundation for Polish Science Homing/2016-2/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) is widely used in the analysis of the chemical composition of biological materials and has the potential to reveal new aspects of the molecular basis of diseases, including different types of cancer. The potential of FT-IR in cancer research lies in its capability of monitoring the biochemical status of cells, which undergo malignant transformation and further examination of spectral features that differentiate normal and cancerous ones using proper mathematical approaches. Such examination can be performed with the use of chemometric tools, such as partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) classification and partial least squares regression (PLSR), and proper application of preprocessing methods and their correct sequence is crucial for success. Here, we performed a comparison of several state-of-the-art methods commonly used in infrared biospectroscopy (denoising, baseline correction, and normalization) with the addition of methods not previously used in infrared biospectroscopy classification problems: Mie extinction extended multiplicative signal correction, Eiler's smoothing, and probabilistic quotient normalization. We compared all of these approaches and their effect on the data structure, classification, and regression capability on experimental FT-IR spectra collected from five different prostate normal and cancerous cell lines. Additionally, we tested the influence of added spectral noise. Overall, we concluded that in the case of the data analyzed here, the biggest impact on data structure and performance of PLS-DA and PLSR was caused by the baseline correction; therefore, much attention should be given, especially to this step of data preprocessing.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedCell LineDiscriminant AnalysisHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisMalePrincipal Component AnalysisProstateSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredEMSCFT-IR spectroscopyPLS-DAPLSRpreprocessingprostate cancer cells

Identifiers

PMID33924045
PMCPMC8073124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.