Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33923970›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Toxic Organic Contaminants in Airborne Particles: Levels, Potential Sources and Risk Assessment.

Donatella Pomata, Patrizia Di Filippo, Carmela Riccardi, Federica Castellani, Giulia Simonetti, Elisa Sonego, Francesca Buiarelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A new device for bronchoscopy for better protection.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donatella PomataItalian Workers' Compensation Authority via Roberto Ferruzzi 38, 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7967-6235
Patrizia Di FilippoItalian Workers' Compensation Authority via Roberto Ferruzzi 38, 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-1691
Carmela RiccardiItalian Workers' Compensation Authority via Roberto Ferruzzi 38, 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3751-6049
Federica CastellaniDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0689-3789
Giulia SimonettiDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6278-6905
Elisa SonegoDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4557-9311
Francesca BuiarelliDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5104-8854
Sapienza University of Rome · ITIstituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last years, many studies have focused on risk assessment of exposure of workers to airborne particulate matter (PM). Several studies indicate a strong correlation between PM and adverse health outcomes, as a function of particle size. In the last years, the study of atmospheric particulate matter has focused more on particles less than 10 μm or 2.5 μm in diameter; however, recent studies identify in particles less than 0.1 μm the main responsibility for negative cardiovascular effects. The present paper deals with the determination of 66 organic compounds belonging to six different classes of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the ultrafine, fine and coarse fractions of PM (PM < 0.1 µm; 0.1 < PM < 2.5 µm and 2.5 < PM < 10 µm) collected in three outdoor workplaces and in an urban outdoor area. Data obtained were analyzed with principal component analysis (PCA), in order to underline possible correlation between sites and classes of pollutants and characteristic emission sources. Emission source studies are, in fact, a valuable tool for both identifying the type of emission source and estimating the strength of each contamination source, as useful indicator of environment healthiness. Moreover, both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks were determined in order to estimate human health risk associated to study sites. Risk analysis was carried out evaluating the contribution of pollutant distribution in PM size fractions for all the sites. The results highlighted significant differences between the sites and specific sources of pollutants related to work activities were identified. In all the sites and for all the size fractions of PM both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk values were below acceptable and safe levels of risks recommended by the regulatory agencies.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsEnvironmental PollutantsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansOrganic ChemicalsParticle SizeParticulate MatterRisk AssessmentAir PollutantsEnvironmental PollutantsOrganic ChemicalsParticulate Matterorganic pollutant measurementsoutdoor environmentsparticle-size distributionprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID33923970
PMCPMC8073354
OpenAlexW3154900368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.