ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Pretreatment [
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic value of baseline 18FDG - Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy - External multicentre validation model.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- The value of PFS36 as a primary endpoint for radiotherapy trials in patients with LACC: individual patient data from the Chinese NCC and validation from 26 RCTs.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Article
- Role of PET/CT in improving the cost effectiveness of nimotuzumab in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to determine whether semiquantitative parameters obtained from both the primary tumor and metastatic pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) diagnosed in fluoro-18-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET-CT) are associated with disease-free survival (DFS), local control (LC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced squamous cervical cancer (LACC) and metastatic pelvic lymph nodes. MATERIALS: Retrospective analysis was performed on 93 female patients with FIGO IIIC1. The median age was 53 years (27-75). The PET parameters both in the primary tumor and metastatic pelvic lymph nodes, including SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG, MTV, heterogeneity, along with clinical variables, before radical cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy (RCT) were analyzed. The
resultsMedian follow-up was 38 months (4.5-92.6). Three years and five years OS were 75% and 70% respectively. Patients with SUVmax above 12.6, SUVmean above 7.6 and with TLG in tumors >245.7 lived longer (
conclusionsThis study is the first report showing that in LACC patient population with PLN involvement treated with definitive RCT, high SUVmean, SUVmax and TLG of the primary tumor in FDG-PET-CT were linked with longer OS. Lower SUVmean and SUVmax were linked with shorter DMFS. None of the clinical factors and the nodal FDG-PET-CT parameters influenced the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.