Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33923506›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2021

Predictive Validity of the Snatch Pull Force-Velocity Profile to Determine the Snatch One Repetition-Maximum in Male and Female Elite Weightlifters.

Ingo Sandau, Helmi Chaabene, Urs Granacher

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exercise Evaluation and Prescription-Second Edition.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ingo SandauResearch Group Weightlifting, Institute for Applied Training Science, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2552-4786
Helmi ChaabeneDivision of Training and Movement Sciences, University of Potsdam, Research Focus Cognition Sciences, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7812-7931
Urs GranacherDivision of Training and Movement Sciences, University of Potsdam, Research Focus Cognition Sciences, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7095-813X

Funding

German Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building, and Community Institute for Applied Training Science, KT 1-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prediction of one repetition-maximum (1RM) performance from specific tests is highly relevant for the monitoring of training in weightlifting. Therefore, this study aimed at examining the predictive validity of the theoretical 1RM snatch (

methodsEight (three female, five male) elite weightlifters carried out a 1RM snatch test followed by a snatch pull test with loads of 80% and 110% of the previously determined 1RM snatch. Barbell kinematics were determined for all lifts using video-tracking. From the snatch pull barbell kinematics, the snatch pull FvR

resultsThe main findings indicated a non-significant (

conclusionsThis study provides a new approach to estimate 1RM snatch performance in elite weightlifters using the snatch pull FvR

Indexed as

monitoringperformancetrainingvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID33923506
PMCPMC8167790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.