ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Diagnosis of Leukaemia in Blood Slides Based on a Fine-Tuned and Highly Generalisable Deep Learning Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated leukemia detection from microscopic images using deep transfer learning with explainable AI-based analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancing Laboratory Medicine Practice With Machine Learning: Swift yet Exact.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2025Review
- A Chronological Overview of Using Deep Learning for Leukemia Detection: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2024Article
- Hybrid Techniques for the Diagnosis of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on Fusion of CNN Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic identifying and counting blood cells in smear images by using single shot detector and Taguchi method.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Deep Learning and Entropy-Based Texture Features for Color Image Classification.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Colour and Texture Descriptors for Visual Recognition: A Historical Overview.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
- Automatic Detection and Counting of Blood Cells in Smear Images Using RetinaNet.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leukaemia is a dysfunction that affects the production of white blood cells in the bone marrow. Young cells are abnormally produced, replacing normal blood cells. Consequently, the person suffers problems in transporting oxygen and in fighting infections. This article proposes a convolutional neural network (CNN) named LeukNet that was inspired on convolutional blocks of VGG-16, but with smaller dense layers. To define the LeukNet parameters, we evaluated different CNNs models and fine-tuning methods using 18 image datasets, with different resolution, contrast, colour and texture characteristics. We applied data augmentation operations to expand the training dataset, and the 5-fold cross-validation led to an accuracy of 98.61%. To evaluate the CNNs generalisation ability, we applied a cross-dataset validation technique. The obtained accuracies using cross-dataset experiments on three datasets were 97.04, 82.46 and 70.24%, which overcome the accuracies obtained by current state-of-the-art methods. We conclude that using the most common and deepest CNNs may not be the best choice for applications where the images to be classified differ from those used in pre-training. Additionally, the adopted cross-dataset validation approach proved to be an excellent choice to evaluate the generalisation capability of a model, as it considers the model performance on unseen data, which is paramount for CAD systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.